From chatbots to research workflows
Our agentic work evaluates whether AI can search, synthesize and forecast—not simply answer isolated prompts.
Selected AIDF and collaborative research spans live multi-agent financial forecasting, deep-document research, trustworthy retrieval, blockchain graph intelligence, human-behavior foundation models, multimodal scientific reasoning, synthetic stress testing and AI-native empirical methods. The common theme is simple: frontier AI should not only predict better; it should reason over complex systems, produce evidence, withstand scrutiny and make scientific conclusions more reliable.
The map below shows the recurring research programs behind the publication portfolio. Select a theme to see what it is trying to solve.
Agents that search, reason, collaborate and execute multi-step financial research workflows.
These papers span frontier AI, data systems and computational research infrastructure—from LLM agents and financial benchmarks to blockchain graphs, behavior foundation models and multimodal scientific reasoning. Each summary is written for a broad audience, and every card links to Google Scholar.
The journal portfolio complements the conference work with durable research on AI-enabled empirical methods, decentralized-finance risk, networks and the consequences of AI for work: how to correct bias, build valid variables, control confounding and understand complex digital systems.
The academic portfolio is intentionally built around problems that matter in both worlds: autonomous research, evidence quality, model reliability, market forecasting, blockchain intelligence, human behavior and the statistical validity of AI-generated information.
Our agentic work evaluates whether AI can search, synthesize and forecast—not simply answer isolated prompts.
Hallucination, retrieval drift and weak financial reasoning are turned into benchmarkable research problems.
Blockchain and exchange research models dynamic transaction structure, fraud, routing and arbitrage as connected systems.
Behavior models, machine-generated measures, textual confounding and missing data all require stronger scientific safeguards.